In the world of post-judgment collection, creditors frequently encounter a debtor who in an effort to shield his/her assets transfers those assets to a trust for "asset protection." While creditor's counsel can generally enforce the judgment against the revocable trust assets as a fraudulent transfer when the transfer of the assets occurred after the clear existence of the debt whether pre or post-judgment, what happens when the debtor transfers those assets to the revocable trust before the creditors claim arose or the debtor even knew of the creditor's potential claim?
Asset protection is a set of legal techniques and a body of statutory and common law dealing with lawfully protecting assets of individuals and business entities from civil money judgments. The goal of all lawful asset protection planning is to lawfully insulate as much as possible assets from claims of creditors without concealment or tax evasion. If you have run up against this issue in your attempt to collect a judgment, your next steps must be strategic and carefully thought out.
While the Phantom of the Opera was a work of fiction, the phantom discharge is the real deal. If you are collecting a judgment in California, generally all property that is acquired during the course of a marriage belongs jointly to both spouses, even if only one spouse is on the title. This property is called "community property," and it is owned by both spouses as tenants in the entirety. In California, even if only one spouse signed the paperwork for a debt, most debts that arise during the course of the marriage are owed by the community (that is by both spouses). Read more about debt collection and community property here.
An affirmative defense is an allegation for justification for the defendant have acted or not acted as is alleged in the complaint. The defendant is simply arguing that he has a good reason for having done what is alleged in the complaint, and therefore should be entirely or partially excused from all criminal liability. Defendants in commercial collections cases often try to use these types of justifications as to why he/she should not have to pay the money alleged in the complaint.